What is Share of Life and why is it changing how we measure brands?
Imagine the impossible: the greatest philosophers of the 20th century sit at the same table and sign a single document about the state of human civilization in 2025. It’s not a settling of scores or a celebration of progress. It’s something more unsettling and more valuable: a call for clarity.
They acknowledge advances that no other time could have dreamed of and, at the same time, point out the major pending issues that threaten to empty that progress of meaning.
A more capable world… and a more fragile one
They agree on something essential: we have never been so capable of changing the world … nor so fragile in the face of our own decisions.
We have reduced extreme poverty in vast regions, defeated diseases, connected continents in seconds, and elevated to the status of rights many moral intuitions that for centuries were mere aspirations: human dignity, formal equality, the rejection of racism, the condemnation of totalitarianism.
Science has opened doors that were once walls: from the genome to the galaxy, from the brain to artificial intelligence.
But that same capacity coexists with a new vulnerability.
Interconnectedness transforms every crisis into a ripple effect. A pandemic, a war, a financial decision no longer affects just a few, but millions. Technology has accelerated faster than ethics. We have more power than ever before and, often, less clarity than ever before about how, why, and to what extent to use it.
The technological promise and the void of meaning
For this “impossible council” of philosophers, 2025 is the year in which technology ceases to be a tool and becomes atmosphere.
We live, work, love, and think within a pervasive digital ecosystem. Generative artificial intelligence writes, designs, recommends, and decides. Algorithms manage our time, our attention, our purchases, and even our relationships.
This, they say, is a radical ambivalence. On the one hand, it amplifies creativity, democratizes access to knowledge, and makes possible a global collaboration previously unthinkable. On the other, it automates judgments, standardizes discourse, and replaces conversations with streams of stimuli. We don’t lack information; we lack critical thinking.
We don’t lack answers; we lack better questions.
The greatest risk of our time is not that machines will think like humans, but that humans will stop thinking like humans . That we will delegate to technology what we should never outsource: meaning, responsibility, and conscience.
Democracy weary, polarization inflamed
In the political sphere, the declaration acknowledges a historic victory: after the horrors of the 20th century, the expansion of democracy, civil rights, and the rule of law has prevented further global catastrophes. Millions of people today live with more freedom than their grandparents did.
And yet, a sense of democratic fatigue is palpable. Distrust of institutions, parties, and the media is growing. Polarization is fueled by algorithms that reward shouting over reasoned argument. Echo chambers transform dissent into a threat. Freedom of expression is championed, but the cancellation of dissenting voices is a common practice.
Philosophers agree that one of the great tasks of this decade will be to reimagine public space : to move from the politics of spectacle to the politics of encounter ; from profitable outrage to responsible dialogue; from a collection of warring tribes to a mature community capable of sustaining disagreements without destroying bridges.
The planet: sufficient knowledge, insufficient will
Regarding our relationship with the Earth, the diagnosis is stark: we know what is happening, we know what needs to be done, and yet we are not doing enough . The climate crisis, the loss of biodiversity, and the pollution of water, air, and soil are no longer ideological debates; they are measured realities.
The technical capacity to mitigate and adapt exists. What’s lacking isn’t science, it’s will.
Here we see a profound moral contradiction: a species that has understood its future depends on ecological balance, yet continues to behave as if it were an exception to the laws of life. The challenge is not merely to “be sustainable” as a slogan, but to be consistent : to align production, consumption, cities, transportation, energy, and the economic model with the simplest and most revolutionary idea: we cannot prosper on a sick planet.
Hyperconnected individuals, fragmented lives
On a personal level, the group of philosophers sees an equally intense paradox. Never before has there been so much freedom to choose lifestyles, identities, careers, and places to live. Never before has there been so much visibility for causes previously silenced. And yet, never before have so many people felt so alone, so anxious, so lost.
The culture of constant productivity and the logic of “personal branding” transfer market demands to the individual: to always be relevant, always visible, always capable of improvement. We look at ourselves on screens more than ever; we look each other in the eye less than ever. We are constantly showing ourselves, but we feel unseen.
This impossible manifesto calls for a shift: to reclaim spaces of guilt-free silence, unhurried conversation, and presence without multitasking. To stop measuring life in performance metrics and return to measuring it in depth, in connections, in meaning.
Unprecedented progress, unresolved debts
The statement concludes with a double truth that sounds both like a diagnosis and a challenge:
- Never before has humanity been so close to being able to live in accordance with many of its ideals.
- Never before has the gap been so wide between what we can do and what we actually do with that power.
The major outstanding issues they point out are clear:
- Reconnecting technical progress with human purpose.
- Strengthen democracies that not only govern, but also inspire and unite.
- Moving from ecological awareness to ecological commitment .
- Putting the person back at the center of the story —not the data, not the algorithm, not the KPI .
If these philosophers share anything with the best of contemporary branding, it’s this certainty: every civilization tells a story about who it is and where it’s going . Today, humanity has resources that other eras would have described as divine. The question they leave us with, like a final footnote, could be this:
“Now that we can do almost anything, what do we choose to do with what really matters?”
The answer, as always, will not come solely from governments or corporations. It will come from what each person, each community, and yes, each brand chooses to amplify: fear or hope, noise or meaning, ego or humanity.
I write to you when I have something to tell you.
Get an email every time I publish something new.
Your email will only be used to send you what I publish. Privacy policy
Related posts
